Collaborative Assessment


Now available:  Collaborative Assessment: An Alternative to Psychological Evaluation,
a paper by Bruce Chalmer, Ph.D.

  Download paper (PDF)

What is collaborative assessment?

When is collaborative assessment appropriate?

Why should I use collaborative assessment?

Is collaborative assessment more expensive?

What happens in a collaborative assessment?

What forms do you use?  Can you send me some examples?

Where can I get more information?


What is collaborative assessment?

Collaborative assessment is a problem-solving process, originally developed by Bruce Chalmer, Ph.D., that can be used as an alternative to psychological evaluation. It draws from the ideas and techniques of narrative therapy (Freedman and Combs, 1996; White and Epston, 1990), as well as those of individualized psychological assessment (Fischer, 1985).  Note:  For a more in-depth discussion, click here to download a paper (in PDF format) by Bruce Chalmer, called Collaborative Assessment:  An Alternative to Psychological Evaluation.

top of page


When is collaborative assessment appropriate?

Any time a psychological evaluation would be used, when the people involved prefer a collaborative, problem-solving approach. For example:

top of page


Why should I use collaborative assessment?

Because it promotes results that you may find preferable to the results of psychological evaluations. (See comparative table for a summary on the differences between the two approaches.)

One effect of the collaborative approach is to invite the people who are affected by the problem to work together against the problem, rather than to work against each other. The "heat" is put on the problem, not any one person. This in turn frees people to assume responsibility for opposing problems, rather than engaging in blame or other damaging practices.

Another effect is that the collaborative approach produces solutions already in progress, generated by the people concerned. This is in contrast to "expert" recommendations that may be of limited usefulness or acceptability to the people involved. Collaborative assessment seeks useful and practical outcomes, rather than diagnoses or classifications of people.

top of page


Is collaborative assessment more expensive?

No. The cost is comparable to psychological evaluation. In both types of process, some circumstances can be handled briefly, and others involve more time (and therefore cost). Insurance can often be used on the same basis.

top of page


What happens in a collaborative assessment?

A facilitator meets with the person(s) requesting the assessment to determine who should be invited to participate. The facilitator then arranges to meet with the participants individually or in one or more groups, as seems appropriate. If any standardized testing or specialized (e.g., neuropsychological or medical) procedures are to be included, these are carried out by the facilitator or specialist.

The focus of collaborative assessment is on clarifying the effects of the problems, and identifying ways that participants in the process (and perhaps others) have found effective.  

top of page


What forms do you use?  Can you send me some examples?

Collaborative assessment does not use predetermined forms.  If any standardized procedures are to be used, that is determined collaboratively by the people involved.

Regarding examples, collaborative assessment need not generate a report per se.  However, we do have some examples of documents written to fulfill administrative requirements as part of collaborative assessments in school settings.  Contact us for more information.

top of page


Where can I get more information?

Contact the Vermont Center for Collaborative Assessment at 802-860-6671, or email us at: vcca@someware.com.

top of page

References:
Fischer, C. Individualizing Psychological Assessment. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1985
Freedman, J. and Combs, G. Narrative Therapy. New York: W.W. Norton, 1996.
White, M. and Epston, D. Narrative Means to Therapeutic Ends. New York: W.W. Norton, 1990.


  Psychological evaluation Collaborative assessment
Purpose Diagnosis/classification Problem-solving
Subject A person assumed to have one or more problems
(i.e., the person "has" the problem)
A problem (or several) distressing to one or more people
(i.e., the problem is the problem)
Methods Standardized tests designed to diagnose and
classify the subject according to norms, and to
fulfill administrative requirements

Interviews focused on the subject's characteristics
as interpreted by the evaluator
Collaborative conversations among the people
involved with the problem, focused on how they
are affected and how they have been effective
against it

Standardized tests used (if at all) to provide
additional descriptive data about the problem
Product A report containing the evaluator's diagnoses,
interpretations, and recommendations;  written in
professional language from a detached, "expert"
perspective
Solutions generated and implemented by the
people affected by the problem; if useful, a written
summary of the process or other documentation, 
written in everyday language
Criterion "Objective" accuracy Usefulness for the people involved

back to text

top of page

Hit Counter